<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology - Blog &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pocinc.net/blog/tag/security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pocinc.net/blog</link>
	<description>Today. Tomorrow. Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Is The Most secure Browser?</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/what-is-the-most-secure-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/what-is-the-most-secure-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accuvant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author: Sean Michael Kerner (eSecurity Planet) For as long as there has been more than one browser, users have been asking which browser is more secure. Answering the question has often led to an evaluation of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities and &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/what-is-the-most-secure-browser/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/what-is-the-most-secure-browser//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress updates to 3.0.5 to cover security issues</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/wordpress-updates-to-3-0-5-to-cover-security-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/wordpress-updates-to-3-0-5-to-cover-security-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress 3.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress has released another update to their popular blogging software, fixing a number of security concerns that popped up. The security issues fixed involve XSS (cross site scripting) and a user access level glitch (allowed normal users to see posts &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/wordpress-updates-to-3-0-5-to-cover-security-issues/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/wordpress-updates-to-3-0-5-to-cover-security-issues//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Exploit Targets Old Versions of IE (Why you should upgrade)</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/new-exploit-targets-old-versions-of-ie-why-you-should-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/new-exploit-targets-old-versions-of-ie-why-you-should-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another attack has been released that focuses on older versions of Internet Explorer. This is why everyone should always make certain that they keep their browsers updated at all times. This doesn&#8217;t mean you have to upgrade to the &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/new-exploit-targets-old-versions-of-ie-why-you-should-upgrade/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/new-exploit-targets-old-versions-of-ie-why-you-should-upgrade//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Software Can Ferret Out Who&#8217;s a Human and Who&#8217;s a Bot</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/security-software-can-ferret-out-whos-a-human-and-whos-a-bot/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/security-software-can-ferret-out-whos-a-human-and-whos-a-bot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antispam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HumanPresent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pramana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZCorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author: Jeremy Kirk (CIO) An Atlanta security company has come up with a technology it says can block automated programs responsible for perpetuating nuisances such as spam, fake e-mail registrations and click fraud. The software, HumanPresent, essentially ferrets out, for &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/security-software-can-ferret-out-whos-a-human-and-whos-a-bot/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/security-software-can-ferret-out-whos-a-human-and-whos-a-bot//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker virus starts to attack computers</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-virus-starts-to-attack-computers/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-virus-starts-to-attack-computers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Worm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downadup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A malicious software program known as Conficker is slowly being activated, weeks after being dismissed as a false alarm, according to computer security experts. Source: Telegraph (UK) Conficker, also known as Downadup or Kido, was expected to wreak havoc on &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-virus-starts-to-attack-computers/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-virus-starts-to-attack-computers//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker&#8217;s $9.1 billion estimated economic cost</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/confickers-91-billion-estimated-economic-cost/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/confickers-91-billion-estimated-economic-cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adware & Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viruses And Worms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Dancho Danchev @ ZDNet In a recent blog post, the Cyber Secure Institute claims that based on their previous studies into the average cost of such malware attacks, the economic loss due to the Conficker worm could be as &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/confickers-91-billion-estimated-economic-cost/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/confickers-91-billion-estimated-economic-cost//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google updates Chrome due to issue in IE tab security</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/google-updates-chrome-due-to-issue-in-ie-tab-security/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/google-updates-chrome-due-to-issue-in-ie-tab-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Sean Michael Kerner @ InternetNews Google today updated its stable version of the Chrome browser to version 1.0.154.58 to fix a serious security issue. The &#8216;funny&#8217; thing is the issue is triggered by Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer (IE) browser. The &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/google-updates-chrome-due-to-issue-in-ie-tab-security/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/google-updates-chrome-due-to-issue-in-ie-tab-security//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s CAPTCHA experiment and the human factor</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/technology-news/googles-captcha-experiment-and-the-human-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/technology-news/googles-captcha-experiment-and-the-human-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassroot...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human-Based Computation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Dancho Danchev @ ZDNet Any research is prone to irrelevance if it starts with the wrong research questions, takes the wrong perspective, or in this case, attempts to fight the wrong enemy &#8211; automated bots attempting to recognize CAPTCHAs. &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/technology-news/googles-captcha-experiment-and-the-human-factor/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/technology-news/googles-captcha-experiment-and-the-human-factor//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker update attempts to foil Cabal</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-update-attempts-to-foil-cabal/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-update-attempts-to-foil-cabal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Robert Lemos @ Security Focus The Conficker worm, which checks 250 different domains each day for an update, could become a lot harder to stop, if those responsible for the malicious program can get their latest code to infected &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-update-attempts-to-foil-cabal/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-update-attempts-to-foil-cabal//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conficker Worm Gets an Evil Twin</title>
		<link>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-worm-gets-an-evil-twin/</link>
		<comments>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-worm-gets-an-evil-twin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRI International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocinc.net/blog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The criminals behind the widespread Conficker worm have released a new version of the malware that could signal a major shift in the way the worm operates. Source: Robert McMillan @ CIO February 19, 2009 — IDG News Service — &#8230; <a href="http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-worm-gets-an-evil-twin/ ">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pocinc.net/blog/security-news/conficker-worm-gets-an-evil-twin//feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

